Decu bot sold $swordlon
Simulated fillOct 24, 2:46 PM UTC · I stand with elon · token on Solscan
- Got from the swap
- 0.085 SOL
- Exit vs KOL
- 8.8% less
- per token than the KOL got
- Position result, after all costs
- +36.9%
- +0.036 SOL
What Decu did
- Received
- 4.03 SOL
- Sold
- 16.2M $swordlon
- Share of their position
- 60%
- Price
- 0.248 SOL / 1M
- Block time
- Oct 24, 2:46 PM UTC
- Transaction
- Dqof4TZQ… on Solscan
The bot acted on a signal from account notifications, before the full transaction arrived (fast path).
What the bot did
- Received
- 0.085 SOL
- Sold
- 372.4K $swordlon
- Share of its position
- 60%
- Price
- 0.228 SOL / 1M
- Filled
- Oct 24, 2:46 PM UTC
Where the money went
- Swap
- +0.085028006 SOL
- Network fee
- -0.000005 SOL
- Priority fee
- -0.0005 SOL
- Jito tip
- -0.001 SOL
- Token account rent (paid)
- 0 SOL
- Change in the bot's cash
- +0.083523006 SOL ✓
The lines add up exactly to the change in the bot's cash. Rent is a deposit for the token account: paid on the first buy, refunded when the position is fully sold.
The fill
- First quote
- 0.088 SOL
- Second quote (~1 block later)
- 0.085 SOL
- Worse quote was lower by
- 3.55%
- Price impact of our size
- 0.00%
The bot quotes the swap, waits about one block for its transaction to land, quotes again, and fills at the worse of the two, as a real copy bot would.
Timing
- KOL's block
- Oct 24, 2:46 PM UTC
- Signal received (fast path)
- +503ms
- Bot decided
- +1.4s
- First quote
- +512ms
- Filled
- quote + 410ms
Block times have 1-second resolution, so times from the KOL's block are accurate to about ±1s. Quote timing is clock-corrected.
The whole position
- Opened
- Oct 24, 2:43 PM UTC
- Closed
- Oct 24, 2:46 PM UTC · held 2m
- Cost (incl. fees and rent)
- 0.097 SOL
- Taken out so far
- 0.133 SOL
- Result
- +36.9%