Cented bot bought $apelink
Simulated fillOct 12, 12:03 AM UTC · apelink · token on Solscan
- Spent on the swap
- 0.176 SOL
- Copy tax
- -4.8%
- paid over the KOL's price
What Cented did
- Paid
- 5.02 SOL
- Bought
- 6.4M $apelink
- Price
- 0.782 SOL / 1M
- Block time
- Oct 12, 12:02 AM UTC
- Transaction
- 5DcEHgYw… on Solscan
The bot acted on a signal from account notifications, before the full transaction arrived (fast path).
What the bot did
- Paid
- 0.176 SOL
- Bought
- 236.9K $apelink
- Price
- 0.745 SOL / 1M
- Filled
- Oct 12, 12:03 AM UTC
Where the money went
- Swap
- -0.176371812 SOL
- Network fee
- -0.000005 SOL
- Priority fee
- -0.0005 SOL
- Jito tip
- -0.001 SOL
- Token account rent (paid)
- 0 SOL
- Change in the bot's cash
- -0.177876812 SOL ✓
The lines add up exactly to the change in the bot's cash. Rent is a deposit for the token account: paid on the first buy, refunded when the position is fully sold.
The fill
- First quote
- 236.9K $apelink
- Second quote (~1 block later)
- 247.6K $apelink
- Worse quote was lower by
- 4.34%
- Price impact of our size
- 0.00%
The bot quotes the swap, waits about one block for its transaction to land, quotes again, and fills at the worse of the two, as a real copy bot would.
Timing
- KOL's block
- Oct 12, 12:02 AM UTC
- Signal received (fast path)
- +1.1s
- Bot decided
- +9.3s
- First quote
- +8.3s
- Filled
- quote + 431ms
Block times have 1-second resolution, so times from the KOL's block are accurate to about ±1s. Quote timing is clock-corrected.
How the size was chosen
- Bot's NAV at the time
- 2.12 SOL
- Base size (5% of NAV)
- 0.106 SOL
- Conviction
- 1.66× (KOL's buy vs their usual)
- Limited by
- nothing
Base buy is 5% of NAV, scaled 0.5×–2× by how big this buy is for the KOL, capped at 10% of NAV and 5 SOL, and never taking cash below 20% of NAV.
The whole position
- Opened
- Oct 12, 12:02 AM UTC
- Closed
- Oct 12, 12:03 AM UTC · held 30s
- Cost (incl. fees and rent)
- 0.536 SOL
- Taken out so far
- 0.301 SOL
- Result
- -43.8%