Decu bot sold $baccoon
Simulated fillOct 9, 11:33 PM UTC · baccoon · token on Solscan
- Got from the swap
- 0.154 SOL
- Exit vs KOL
- 3.4% less
- per token than the KOL got
- Position result, after all costs
- -11.2%
- -0.019 SOL
What Decu did
- Received
- 3.37 SOL
- Sold
- 19.9M $baccoon
- Share of their position
- 100%
- Price
- 0.169 SOL / 1M
- Block time
- Oct 9, 11:33 PM UTC
- Transaction
- 5HqggDvF… on Solscan
The bot acted on a signal from account notifications, before the full transaction arrived (fast path).
What the bot did
- Received
- 0.154 SOL
- Sold
- 941.8K $baccoon
- Share of its position
- 100% (full exit)
- Price
- 0.164 SOL / 1M
- Filled
- Oct 9, 11:33 PM UTC
Where the money went
- Swap
- +0.15410622 SOL
- Network fee
- -0.000005 SOL
- Priority fee
- -0.0005 SOL
- Jito tip
- -0.001 SOL
- Token account rent (refunded)
- +0.00203928 SOL
- Change in the bot's cash
- +0.1546405 SOL ✓
The lines add up exactly to the change in the bot's cash. Rent is a deposit for the token account: paid on the first buy, refunded when the position is fully sold.
The fill
- First quote
- 0.154 SOL
- Second quote (~1 block later)
- 0.166 SOL
- Worse quote was lower by
- 7.27%
- Price impact of our size
- 0.16%
The bot quotes the swap, waits about one block for its transaction to land, quotes again, and fills at the worse of the two, as a real copy bot would.
Timing
- KOL's block
- Oct 9, 11:33 PM UTC
- Signal received (fast path)
- +1.3s
- Bot decided
- +2.2s
- First quote
- +1.3s
- Filled
- quote + 412ms
Block times have 1-second resolution, so times from the KOL's block are accurate to about ±1s. Quote timing is clock-corrected.
The whole position
- Opened
- Oct 9, 11:29 PM UTC
- Closed
- Oct 9, 11:33 PM UTC · held 3m
- Cost (incl. fees and rent)
- 0.174 SOL
- Taken out so far
- 0.155 SOL
- Result
- -11.2%