Cupsey bot bought $shigella
Simulated fillOct 8, 10:29 PM UTC · New superbug shigella bacteria · token on Solscan
- Spent on the swap
- 0.348 SOL
- Copy tax
- +16.9%
- paid over the KOL's price
What Cupsey did
- Paid
- 2.57 SOL
- Bought
- 5.7M $shigella
- Price
- 0.453 SOL / 1M
- Block time
- Oct 8, 10:29 PM UTC
- Transaction
- 3uPRSA6T… on Solscan
The bot acted on a signal from account notifications, before the full transaction arrived (fast path).
What the bot did
- Paid
- 0.348 SOL
- Bought
- 657.4K $shigella
- Price
- 0.530 SOL / 1M
- Filled
- Oct 8, 10:29 PM UTC
Where the money went
- Swap
- -0.348335687 SOL
- Network fee
- -0.000005 SOL
- Priority fee
- -0.0005 SOL
- Jito tip
- -0.001 SOL
- Token account rent (paid)
- -0.00203928 SOL
- Change in the bot's cash
- -0.351879967 SOL ✓
The lines add up exactly to the change in the bot's cash. Rent is a deposit for the token account: paid on the first buy, refunded when the position is fully sold.
The fill
- First quote
- 657.4K $shigella
- Second quote (~1 block later)
- 672.1K $shigella
- Worse quote was lower by
- 2.18%
- Price impact of our size
- 0.35%
The bot quotes the swap, waits about one block for its transaction to land, quotes again, and fills at the worse of the two, as a real copy bot would.
Timing
- KOL's block
- Oct 8, 10:29 PM UTC
- Signal received (fast path)
- +856ms
- Bot decided
- +1.5s
- First quote
- +596ms
- Filled
- quote + 423ms
Block times have 1-second resolution, so times from the KOL's block are accurate to about ±1s. Quote timing is clock-corrected.
How the size was chosen
- Bot's NAV at the time
- 3.65 SOL
- Base size (5% of NAV)
- 0.183 SOL
- Conviction
- 1.91× (KOL's buy vs their usual)
- Limited by
- nothing
Base buy is 5% of NAV, scaled 0.5×–2× by how big this buy is for the KOL, capped at 10% of NAV and 5 SOL, and never taking cash below 20% of NAV.
The whole position
- Opened
- Oct 8, 10:29 PM UTC
- Closed
- Oct 8, 10:29 PM UTC · held 4s
- Cost (incl. fees and rent)
- 0.352 SOL
- Taken out so far
- 0.250 SOL
- Result
- -29.0%