Round 1 From Round 1 (Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 8, 2026), under its rules. Round 1 results β
Cented bot sold $π/ACC
Simulated fillOct 1, 6:09 PM UTC Β· π/Accelerationism Β· token on Solscan
- Got from the swap
- 0.0018 SOL
- Exit vs KOL
- 13.0% more
- per token than the KOL got
- Position result, after all costs
- -85.8%
- -0.020 SOL
What Cented did
- Received
- 1.71 SOL
- Sold
- 13.2M $π/ACC
- Share of their position
- 100%
- Price
- 0.129 SOL / 1M
- Block time
- Oct 1, 6:09 PM UTC
- Transaction
- 3HisYgWi⦠on Solscan
The bot acted on a signal from account notifications, before the full transaction arrived (fast path).
What the bot did
- Received
- 0.0018 SOL
- Sold
- 12.3K $π/ACC
- Share of its position
- 100% (full exit)
- Price
- 0.149 SOL / 1M
- Filled
- Oct 1, 6:09 PM UTC
Where the money went
- Swap
- +0.001829343 SOL
- Network fee
- -0.000005 SOL
- Priority fee
- -0.0005 SOL
- Jito tip
- -0.001 SOL
- Token account rent (refunded)
- +0.00207408 SOL
- Change in the bot's cash
- +0.002398423 SOL β
The lines add up exactly to the change in the bot's cash. Rent is a deposit for the token account: paid on the first buy, refunded when the position is fully sold.
The fill
- First quote
- 0.0018 SOL
- Second quote (~1 block later)
- 0.0019 SOL
- Worse quote was lower by
- 6.12%
- Price impact of our size
- β
The bot quotes the swap, waits about one block for its transaction to land, quotes again, and fills at the worse of the two, as a real copy bot would.
Timing
- KOL's block
- Oct 1, 6:09 PM UTC
- Signal received (fast path)
- +1.1s
- Bot decided
- +10.2s
- First quote
- +9.3s
- Filled
- quote + 416ms
Block times have 1-second resolution, so times from the KOL's block are accurate to about Β±1s. Quote timing is clock-corrected.
The whole position
- Opened
- Oct 1, 6:05 PM UTC
- Closed
- Oct 1, 6:09 PM UTC Β· held 4m
- Cost (incl. fees and rent)
- 0.023 SOL
- Taken out so far
- 0.0032 SOL
- Result
- -85.8%